Enterprise NVMe Round-Up 2: SK Hynix, Samsung, DapuStor and DERA
by Billy Tallis on February 14, 2020 11:15 AM ESTDapuStor Haishen3
Shenzhen DAPU Microelectronics Co.—DapuStor for short— has a fairly ordinary business model for a smaller player in the enterprise SSD market: partner with a controller supplier and a NAND supplier, and write some custom firmware. In the case of the DapuStor Haishen3 series, the controller comes from Marvell and the NAND is from Kioxia (formerly Toshiba Memory).
The DapuStor Haishen3 drives use Kioxia/Toshiba BiCS4 96-layer 3D eTLC, the most advanced NAND flash included in this review. We're testing both the H3000 and H3100 versions: 1 DWPD for read-intensive workloads, or 3 DWPD for more write-heavy mixed IO. DapuStor touts the power efficiency of the Haishen3 drives as one of the key selling points. As far as advanced features, the drives include support for multiple NVMe namespaces, and dual-port PCIe support for high availability when connected through appropriate backplanes. DapuStor is also willing to supply custom firmware enabling other advanced features like SR-IOV virtualization, streams/IO determinism, and Key-Value or Zoned namespace support. However, it's not clear how ready those options are—the Haishen3 is a very new product, and our samples were slightly delayed so that we could get the latest firmware.
DapuStor Haishen3 Series Specifications | ||||||||||||
Model | H3000 | H3100 | ||||||||||
Controller | Marvell 88SS1098 Zao | |||||||||||
Form Factor | 2.5" 15mm U.2, HHHL AIC |
HHHL AIC |
2.5" 15mm U.2, HHHL AIC |
HHHL AIC |
||||||||
Interface, Protocol | PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe 1.3 | |||||||||||
Capacities (TB) | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 6.4 | 12.8 | ||
NAND Flash | Kioxia (Toshiba) 512Gbit BiCS4 96L 3D TLC | |||||||||||
DRAM | Nanya 8Gbit DDR4-2666 | |||||||||||
Sequential Read (GB/s) | 3.5 | 3.5 | ||||||||||
Sequential Write (GB/s) | 1.3 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 3.4 | ||||
Random Read IOPS | 450k | 710k | 450k | 710k | ||||||||
Random Write IOPS | 38k | 60k | 108k | 99k | 140k | 98k | 170k | 335k | 300k | 465k | ||
Power Draw (Watts) |
Typical | 6.5 | 8.5 | 6.5 | 8.5 | |||||||
Max | 9.5 | 13 | 15 | 9.5 | 13 | 15 | ||||||
Write Endurance | 1 DWPD | 3 DWPD | ||||||||||
Warranty | 5 years |
The Marvell 88SS1098 "Zao" controller is their 8-channel solution for enterprise/datacenter SSDs, bringing lots of features that were missing from the 1093/1092 "Eldora" series controllers and left out of the newer 1100 series client SSD controllers. The 1098 isn't quite Marvell's top of the line SSD controller, but their 88SS1088 16-channel controller is a two-chip solution that's pretty much two 1098s connected by a 4GB/s link.
Our Haishen3 review samples use the 15mm U.2 form factor, but only have a single PCB internally instead of two staked. That makes the case a fairly large heatsink, with extrusions to allow close contact to the controller and NAND, and cutouts for the two large power loss protection capacitors.
DapuStor is also working on a Haishen3-XL series that uses Kioxia's low-latency 3D SLC NAND to compete against Samsung Z-SSDs, and that should be available very soon.
DERA D5007 Series
DERA is another Chinese brand we were only recently introduced to. They announced their second generation of enterprise SSDs at the end of 2018 and are now trying to enter the North American market after securing design wins with numerous major Chinese cloud and telecom providers.
DERA is part of China's efforts to develop competitive home-grown technology. DERA has their own in-house TAI NVMe SSD controller that is used in the D5437 and D5457 SSDs we are testing today. Their NAND supplier is UNIC, which has been buying Intel 64L wafers since 2018 and doing their own testing, binning and packaging. UNIC eventually plans to be a distributor for Yangtze Memory's 3D NAND, but even though YMTC announced mass production of their 64L NAND back in November, they have not had any significant impact on the NAND market yet. (And probably won't any time soon, given that YMTC is based in Wuhan.) For DRAM, DERA is using Micron DDR3.
DERA D5007 Series Specifications | ||||||||
Model | D5437 | D5457 | ||||||
Controller | DERA TAI-EN316801-P02 | |||||||
Form Factor | 2.5" 15mm U.2 or PCIe HHHL AIC | |||||||
Interface, Protocol | PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe 1.3 | |||||||
Capacities | 2 TB | 4 TB | 8 TB | 1.6 TB | 3.2 TB | 6.4 TB | ||
NAND Flash | UNIC2 (Intel) 512Gbit 64L 3D TLC | |||||||
DRAM | Micron DDR3-1866 | |||||||
Sequential Read (GB/s) | 3.3 | 3.3 | ||||||
Sequential Write (GB/s) | 1.8 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 3.2 | ||
Random Read IOPS | 820k | 830k | 830k | 820k | 830k | 830k | ||
Random Write IOPS | 110k | 160k | 145k | 240k | 360k | 375k | ||
Power Draw (Watts) |
Random Read | 13.0 | 14.0 | 14.5 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 14.5 | |
Random Write | 15.0 | 18.0 | 18.4 | 15.0 | 18.5 | 20.0 | ||
Idle | 7.0 | |||||||
Write Endurance | 1 DWPD | 3 DWPD | ||||||
Warranty | 5 years |
As is typical, DERA's SSDs come in two versions that share the same basic hardware but use different overprovisioning ratios to optimize for high capacity and read-oriented workloads (D5437), or higher endurance and better write performance (D5457). These drives have most of the hallmarks of a top of the line enterprise SSD. The controller is a large 16-channel design, with a die size around 114 mm2. Internally, the U.2 versions use a folded PCB to provide plenty of space for NAND and DRAM, and the power loss protection capacitors are mounted on a daughterboard. The case design does allow for a little bit of airflow between the two PCB layers, but the power-hungry stuff still needs to be facing outward for contact with the drive case. The NAND packages on the inward-facing PCB surfaces use fewer dies per package, and when a particular capacity doesn't need to populate all of the pads for NAND, those interior spots are the ones left empty.
The DERA SSDs are limited to by the same PCIe 3.0 x4 interface as the rest of our U.2 drives, but the performance specifications are otherwise mostly higher than the other drives in this review—as are the power consumption ratings.
33 Comments
View All Comments
James5mith - Monday, February 17, 2020 - link
"... but I would gladly purchase a high performance 16TB SSD."Then do so. They aren't ridiculously priced anymore. It's $2000-$4000 per drive depending on manufacturer and interface type.
What is stopping you?
The Micro 9300 Pro 15.36TB is ~$3000 on average. That's a U.2. interface drive. Too slow?
eek2121 - Monday, February 17, 2020 - link
The lack of an M.2 offering? I have yet to find a single 16 TB M.2 SSD available for retail purchase. I have no problem plunking down a few thousand (provided the performance is comparable to Samsung's offerings).CrystalCowboy - Tuesday, February 18, 2020 - link
Most enterprise drives come either in U.2 or in PCIe. And you can buy PCIe-U.2 adapters.CrystalCowboy - Tuesday, February 18, 2020 - link
For that matter, M.2 - U.2 adapters are available and cheap.NV_Me - Friday, February 14, 2020 - link
Thanks for all of the insights Billy! BTW I like the addition of the drop down selection on top,For the PE6011, what is the TBW on either the 1.92TB or 7.68TB drive? I was curious to know if this was a true "1 DWPD" drive.
Billy Tallis - Friday, February 14, 2020 - link
The full spec sheet for the PE6011 just says 1.0 DWPD. It doesn't list TBW.NV_Me - Friday, February 14, 2020 - link
Next time would it be possible to RANK the charts high-low or low-high for improved readability?Hul8 - Saturday, February 15, 2020 - link
If you retain the order, it's easier to compare performance of particular drives by glancing from one chart to the next. That's important with a 9-drive roundup.Normally when they're doing a single product review, that product is highlighted in one color, and it's predecessors or alteratives with another. In that case those items can always be easily spotted in a ranked graph.
JohnLee-SZ - Friday, February 14, 2020 - link
Thanks very much Billy, it's a great review! We DapuStor are continuing developing the whole product portfolio and hope we can deliver some great products to fulfill industry needs.CrystalCowboy - Tuesday, February 18, 2020 - link
PCIe 3.0? Are we supposed to take this seriously?