Samsung Announces First PCIe 5.0 Enterprise SSD: PM1743, Coming In 2022by Ryan Smith on December 23, 2021 7:00 AM EST
Even though CES 2022 is technically still a couple of weeks away, CES-related announcements are already starting to roll in. Among these are Samsung, who is announcing their first PCIe 5.0 SSD for servers, the PM1743. Based around a new, unnamed PCIe controller, Samsung’s latest server SSD is pairing that with the company’s current (sixth) generation V-NAND. Based on their published specifications, Samsung is touting upwards of 70-90% better performance over their previous-generation drive based on the workload. And tying in with CES in a couple of weeks, the new drive has already been awarded a CES 2022 Innovation Award.
At a high level, the PM1743 is the successor to Samsung’s current PM1733 enterprise SSD. Whereas the existing drive is based around a PCIe 4.0 controller and Samsung’s 96L fifth-generation V-NAND, the PM1743 bumps this up to PCIe 5.0 and 128L sixth-generation V-NAND instead. Given the general nature of today’s announcement, the company isn’t offering detailed technical specifications on the drive’s architecture, but between the NAND and controller improvements, they would seem to largely be able to keep up with the additional bandwidth afforded by the move to PCIe 5.0.
On paper, the PCie 5.0 x4 link the drive uses can reach bandwidth rates as high as 15.76GB/sec. For the PM1743, in turn, Samsung is claiming peak sequential read rates of 13GB/second, and peak sequential write rates of 6.6GB/sec (presumably to the drive’s SLC cache). This adds up to 86% higher peak read speeds and 89% higher peak write speeds than the PM1733. Or to put that in terms of IOPS, Samsung is claiming that the new drive will be able to hit 2.5M IOPS on random reads, and 250K IOPS on random writes.
|Samsung Enterprise SSD Specifications|
|Form Factor||U.2 or E3.S||U.2|
|Interface||PCIe 5.0 x4, NVMe||PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe|
|Controller||Unnamed Samsung PCIe 5.0||Samsung S4LR014 PCIe 4.0|
|NAND Flash||Samsung 128L TLC?||Samsing 96L TLC|
|Sequential Read||13000 MB/s||7000 MB/s|
|Sequential Write||6600 MB/s||3500 MB/s|
|Power||Active||30 W?||20 W|
|Write Endurance||?||28 PBW
1.0 DWPD for 5 Years
The updated Samsung controller is also embedding its own security processor and root of trust. Samsung’s announcement is light on the details, but at a high level, the company is doubling down on security by giving the drive a degree of security control independent of the host server.
The company is also touting these updates as having improved the energy efficiency of the PM1743 by 30% over the PM1733, bringing it to 608MB/sec/watt. Given that data transfer rates have improved by upwards of 90% while power efficiency has only improved by 30%, it looks like the PM1743 will have a higher active power utilization rate than its predecessor. Doing some napkin math against the PM1733, which has a published figure of 20W, would put the active power of the PM1743 at around 30W.
Meanwhile, Samsung’s press release also confirms that the company has been working with Intel to validate the new drive. Samsung doesn’t go into any further details, but with Alder Lake (12th gen Core) already shipping now as the first mass market PCIe 5.0-capable platform, Samsung has presumably been testing against that, as well as the forthcoming Sapphire Rapids (next-gen Xeon) platform.
New for this generation of SSDs, Samsung will be offering the PM1743 in two form factors. The first will be the traditional 2.5-inch U.2 form factor. Meanwhile, joining U.2 will be E3.S, a newer 3-inch enterprise and data center form factor that is designed to be slightly larger than U.2 drives while incorporating a connector that can handle up to 16 lanes of PCIe. SSDs of course won’t use that many lanes, but it’s a form factor that both drive and system vendors have been pushing for, making it the front-runner as the eventual successor to U.2. Based on last year’s publication of the E3 2.0 specification, we had been expecting E3.S drives to land in early 2022, so Samsung is right on time.
Finally, the PM1743 will be offered in capacities ranging from 1.92TB to 15.36TB, the same capacities the PM1733 is available at today. So although there is no capacity increase to speak of on a single drive level, since E3.S is half the thickness of a traditional 15mm U.2 drive, Samsung is touting the overall density improvements the new drive will afford. Essentially, if a server uses E3.S, it will be able to accommodate twice as many drives (and thus twice as much storage capacity) as a U.2 configuration.
The PM1743 is sampling now, and according to Samsung mass production will begin in the first quarter of next year.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
shabby - Thursday, December 23, 2021 - linkA bit on the slow side? The new consumer adata drives do 14/12 and 14/10gb writes.
Wrs - Thursday, December 23, 2021 - linkMany enterprise TLC/MLC drives slow the writes to increase write endurance. For write heavy there's Optane
Samus - Thursday, December 23, 2021 - linkI was thinking the same thing but enterprise drives are always slower, even more so than OEM drives. Retail enthusiast drives always get mer hrspwrs.
shabby - Thursday, December 23, 2021 - linkBut does more expensive mean more better? ;)
Tom Sunday - Tuesday, January 4, 2022 - linkSamsung is touting upwards of 70-90% better performance over their previous-generation....I love as everything becomes faster and faster. Being a Walmart forklift lift driver on the third shift I dream about one day to owning a Alder Lake and all Samsung SSD desktop. Greetings from the man on the street!
ArcadeEngineer - Friday, December 24, 2021 - linkThose are figures for SLC cache. Most enterprise drives are designed for sustained workloads and don't use caching.
mode_13h - Sunday, January 2, 2022 - link> Most enterprise drives are designed for sustained workloads and don't use caching.
That's not true. Enterprise drives are usually separated into read-oriented, mixed-workload, and write-oriented. The number of bits per cell (and pricing!) follows from that, although I don't know if even the write-oriented drives use pseudo-SLC. If they don't, then they might indeed still have a write cache.
haukionkannel - Friday, December 24, 2021 - linkWe need U2 to consumer motherboards too. I have a lot of empty 3.5" slots waiting for big and fast SSD storages...
mode_13h - Sunday, January 2, 2022 - linkYou can get M.2 -> U.2 adapter cables. After your M.2 slots are full, then I think you'll need a PCIe card like this:
Oxford Guy - Monday, December 27, 2021 - link'the drive’s SLC cache'
Isn't that pseudo-SLC?
Is there a significant difference in one or more of the following, between multi-layer NAND that is pretending to be SLC and actual SLC:
4) complexity of error correction
5) speed penalty due to error correction
6) speed penalty due to free capacity (e.g. slowdown at greater than 80% percent of space filled)
7) disappearance (i.e. changes into multi-layer allocation if drive reaches a certain capacity)
I remember the Mac Portable. The original used actual static RAM and the revision used pseudo-static RAM. The pseudo-static RAM was not better in any metric except for price. Its battery life hit was higher as it was not static RAM. All of the Mac publications noted the difference in their coverage.
So, I wonder if this 'SLC cache' stuff is actually SLC or has the industry decided to stop differentiating between things that are not the same (i.e. static RAM and pseudostatic RAM).